Federal Child Pornography Crimes We aggressively fight a system designed to convict you.

Cleveland Federal Child Pornography Attorney

Get Experienced & Knowledgeable Legal Representation in Ohio

Child pornography is one of the most serious sex crimes in the United States. Although committing this offense will make you subject to the Ohio criminal justice system, it is possible that federal charges will be handed down as well. A conviction in federal court can lead to a long federal prison sentence, potentially for life.

If you or a loved one has been accused of committing a federal child pornography offense in Ohio, Patituce & Associates has helped countless clients obtain favorable outcomes in federal court. With more than seven decades of combined experience, our legal team is not afraid to go up against the U.S. government in order to protect your rights and future. Let us represent you and mount an aggressive and effective defense on your behalf.

Contact Patituce & Associates today at (440) 709-8088 and schedule a free consultation.

When Does Child Pornography Become a Federal Crime?

According to federal law, child pornography is defined as an image or video of a minor (under 18 years old) being involved in sexually explicit conduct. The U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause gives Congress the authority to regulate interstate and international commerce. In other words, you will face federal charges if the illicit materials, the devices used to store illicit materials, or even the camera used to film or photograph child pornography crosses state or country lines—either online or by mail.

Common types of federal child pornography charges include:

  • Production of children (18 USC § 2251)
  • Selling and buying of children (18 USC § 2251A)
  • Possessing, distributing, or receiving child pornography (18 USC § 2252)
  • Certain activities in relation to material containing or constituting child pornography (18 USC § 2252A)
  • Production of sexually explicit depictions of children to import into the U.S. (18 USC § 2260)

Violating a federal child pornography law will result in severe criminal penalties. For instance, a first offense for producing child pornography (18 USC § 2251) is punishable by a federal prison sentence between 15 and 30 years. A first offense for transporting child pornography across state states or internationally carries a federal prison term between five and 20 years. If you were previously convicted of a sex crime or if the offense was associated with aggravating factors such as sexual or violent abuse, a conviction will lead to harsher penalties.

Ready to Protect Your Rights & Freedom Today

Although mounting a legal defense against federal child pornography charges can be extremely difficult, our firm has been successful in federal court by challenging the government’s evidence. We can help you navigate the complexities of the federal criminal justice system and fight for the best possible results. Do not face the federal government without experienced and skilled legal counsel on your side.

Call (440) 709-8088 today to discuss your case with Patituce & Associates and learn about your legal options.

Facing Criminal Charges?

Contact Our Team Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Results Matter

Recent Victories
  • Significant Reduction, Probation Aggravated Burglary: State v. Boscarello, Cuyahoga County
  • Plea and Record Aggravated Theft: State v. Bailey, Cuyahoga
  • Not Guilty at Trial Attempted Murder/Felonious Assault: State v. Brandon Betliskey
  • Case Dismissed Child Pornography: State v. J.S. (A juvenile) Youngstown
  • Not Guilty at Trial Domestic Violence: Rocky River v. D.F.
  • Charges Dismissed Drug Trafficking: State v. Beckwith, Cuyahoga County
  • Charges Dismissed Drug Trafficking: State v. Bittner, Lorain County
  • Evidence Suppressed, State Lost the Appeal DUI / OVI: City of Cleveland v. Oles
  • Case Dismissed DUI / OVI: Cleveland v. Al-Nazer (2012 TRC 040781)
  • Case Dismissed DUI/OVI w. a weapon: State v. Al-Nazer (Cuyahoga Case No. 13-575491)
/

What Sets Us Apart?

 The Patituce & Associates Difference
  • We Offer No-Cost, Confidential Phone Consultations.

  • Our Team Has Over 70 Years of Combined Experience.

  • Our Lead Attorney Is A Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney.

  • Our Attorneys Have Taken Cases to Jury Trials Over 200 Times.

  • We Are the Firm Other Attorneys, Police & Prosecutors Turn To.

  • We Are Available 24/7.

We Refuse to Lose We Have the Experience You Can Count On